Portfolios are better in assessing the performance of students as they provide a comprehensive view of students’ growth, progress, and achievement over time, compared to the limited snapshot provided by traditional tests.
More detailed answer question
According to research, portfolios offer a more in-depth and holistic view of a student’s progress and growth over time compared to traditional tests. Unlike tests, portfolios consist of various pieces of evidence such as work samples, self-reflections, and feedback from teachers, all of which can illustrate a student’s strengths, weaknesses, achievements, and areas for improvement.
One of the main benefits of portfolios is that they allow for more personalized and authentic assessment. Students have the opportunity to showcase their own unique skills and knowledge based on their interests and learning styles. In contrast, traditional tests often rely on a one-size-fits-all approach that may not accurately reflect a student’s abilities.
In addition, portfolios can also empower students by giving them a sense of ownership and control over their learning journey. By choosing what to include in their portfolio and reflecting on their progress, students can develop self-awareness, metacognitive skills, and a growth mindset.
As education expert Grant Wiggins once said, “The portfolio is the best single reflection of a teacher’s instructional goals and a student’s academic growth over time.”
Here are some additional interesting facts about portfolios and traditional tests:
|Typically include a range of artifacts such as essays, projects, and multimedia presentations||Usually consist of standardized multiple-choice or short-answer questions|
|Involve ongoing assessment and feedback rather than a one-time exam||Are often high-stakes exams that can lead to anxiety and stress|
|Can be used to evaluate a wide range of skills such as creativity, critical thinking, and communication||Are usually focused on content knowledge|
|Encourage students to take responsibility for their own learning and development||Often rely on external factors such as test-taking strategies and test anxiety|
In conclusion, while traditional tests have their place in education, portfolios can provide a more comprehensive and personalized assessment of student learning. By using portfolios as an evaluation tool, educators can gain insights into a student’s progress, growth, and potential, leading to more effective teaching practices and improved academic outcomes.
Video answer to “Which is better in assessing the performance of students portfolio or traditional test?”
This video discusses portfolio assessment and its three principles of content, learning, and equity, as well as the three types of portfolios: working, show, and documentary. It highlights how portfolio assessment is useful to students and teachers as it allows for personal reflection and also provides insights into students’ development and teachers’ effectiveness. The importance of defining, creating, and writing instructional outcomes to be assessed is emphasized, alongside the significance of providing significant evidence for attaining competencies required for AL2. Overall, the video provides guidelines for creating a successful portfolio and using it as a tool for assessment and learning.
I discovered more data
It depends on what is being assessed. Wherever possible, a portfolio of evidence is better since it shows the progression of performance. In some cases, such as reasoning or memory, the traditional test is the only option. Nevertheless, the results of such tests can be built into the portfolio of evidence to present a comprehensive profile of the student’s performance. In my opinion, the traditional test (sitting isolated in a room with other students and writing answers to questions within a specific timeframe) which is not integrated into a portfolio of evidence is overplayed. However, in some instances, there is no alternative where no portfolio is possible.
In addition, people are interested
Enables faculty to assess a set of complex tasks, including interdisciplinary learning and capabilities, with examples of different types of student work. Helps faculty identify curriculum gaps, a lack of alignment with outcomes.